Once again, I’m going to have to be careful what I say and how I say it because once again, I’m bringing you a story about the unfolding train wreck that is the elephant in the room.

Studies have demonstrated conclusively that eye inflammation isn’t just common after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. It is to be expected. Now, lest I be accused of fearmongering or misinformation, let me quickly add that in most cases, it resolves naturally without any lasting harm. In fact, in most cases, people don’t even know that it happened to them, and there is no lasting harm that we know of. But in extreme cases, it does cause permanent vision damage. And yes, as I’ll show you as we go through multiple different studies from the last few years, it can trigger things like Ramsay Hunt disease, among other serious and lasting illnesses, and is a likely cause of this particular conspiracy theory.

I regret to say that the evidence is clear. And with the censorship finally subsiding a little bit, I can more openly talk and chalk up another win to the conspiracy theorists. And I want to be clear from the outset that I take no pleasure in this. To those of you who took the vaccines either because you trusted and you truly believed it was the right thing to do or because you were coerced into it and you were left feeling like you had no choice. I’m sorry and I hope that you are in perfect health and that you never suffer any adverse effects whatsoever.

But the tragic reality is that there are people who have been harmed. And before the censors get trigger happy, may I remind you that vaccine harms from these mRNA jabs are no longer conspiracy theories. And indeed, most countries now have compensation schemes, inadequate though they are, specifically because it is a fact that these governments have now accepted that there are known and recognized injuries from the mRNA jabs. And with the recent updating of the safety labels for mRNA jabs in the United States finally and belatedly acknowledging the very real risk of heart damage particularly among young men, I believe the time has come to put back on the table the issue of nerve damage and in particular damage to the eyes.

Now, why would I want to do that? You might ask, “Isn’t this all just ancient history? Can’t we just move on?” No, we can’t. Because those injured by these jabs have been barely acknowledged, let alone supported. And the people responsible for what I believe is the greatest public health disaster in human history, have yet to be held to account. And I’m sorry to say it, but the now acknowledged damage to hearts and the now acknowledged damage to nerves pales in comparison to the as yet not acknowledged triggering of rare and aggressive things. But I can’t say that yet because apparently the internet isn’t ready for that conversation. Even though we finally acknowledged that this is in fact happening, we’re not ready to ask whether it might be related to the elephant in the room.

Well, hopefully with this video, I can play some small part in bringing us some small step closer to the point where such a conversation is actually possible. My name’s Topher Field. This is the Topher Project and I do what I can to help busy people to keep up with the world as it changes around us. There are some videos that I’ve been wanting to make for a long, long time. And finally, I think we’re at the point where we can have some honest conversations about the real world effects of these mRNA jabs. And that is the conversation I’m seeking to have in this video.

Now, I am 100% viewer supported, and I am incredibly grateful to viewers who have supported my work by buying me a coffee via the button at topherfield.net. And if you find my videos thought-provoking, then you really need to get your hands on my books. I promise they will challenge the way you see the world. And even if in the end you decide that I’m wrong, you’ll still be better off for having read them and had your own thinking challenged. There’s also my documentary on DVD and my t-shirts and hoodies. And all of that is available at goodpeoplebreakbadlaws.com. With every purchase you make, you help me to keep the Topher project going, and you enable me to keep important but sometimes risky conversations going.

All right. Signs of nerve and eye damage from the mRNA jabs came pretty early in the piece after the jabs were given their respective emergency use authorizations around the world.

By late 2021, alarm bells were already ringing and researchers were clamoring to study patients whose vision had been affected following an mRNA jab. The first published study that I’m aware of was conducted in 2021 and published on the 4th of January 2022. This was titled Ocular inflammatory events following COVID 19 vaccination: a multinational case series. Exciting, I know.

Basically, they tracked down people who had presented with post-vaccine eye issues that appeared within 14 days of an mRNA jab, and they followed those people for a few months to see what happened to them. Now, there’s a few important things to keep in mind here because they will become important as we get to some of the other studies we’ll be talking about. This study is by its nature going to miss a huge number of potential candidates. A huge proportion of the people who have eye issues following an mRNA jab that would qualify for this study won’t be included in this study either due to their timing being off or due to them not knowing about the study or due to their physician just dismissing out of hand any possible link between their eye issues and the jabs which is something that we know happened a lot because well all issues were being denied for quite some time there.

So whilst 70 people participated in this study, that by no means suggests that there were only 70 adverse reactions affecting the eyes. Now it’s important to note that in this study, a little over half of the patients that had these eye issues shortly after the mRNA jabs already had a history of eye issues, which would tend to suggest that the effect of the jabs on the eyes isn’t necessarily huge, but it’s enough to really affect people whose vision and eye health was already somewhat marginal. And it’s also important to point out that the vast majority of cases resolved pretty much completely with pretty normal treatments like corticosteroids. In the end, the vision of 92.9% of the participants, which is 65 out of the 70 individuals, was not affected long-term. Good. But that means that the long-term results, the end vision for 7.1% or five of the people, was affected long-term.

Now, two of those people had noticeable but comparatively minor effects that were equal to or less than three lines of loss of vision. And three of the participants had more than three lines of loss of vision. Now, when a study into vision talks about lines, they’re literally talking about the lines on an eye chart, like what you would see on the wall of a GP. Three of the people in this study lost so much of their eyesight that they lost more than three lines on one of these charts. Now, that might sound pretty damning to you, but we do need to take some care here, and for good reason. See, five people out of the 70 in this study or 7.1% having long-term eye damage doesn’t mean that 7.1% of people taking the vaccine are going to have that. No, no, not at all.

We have to keep in mind that on any given day, there’s going to be people developing eye problems or neurological problems or for that matter heart problems and cancers and all the rest of it.

Which means that if you push billions of jabs all around the world, sooner or later someone’s going to have one of these problems shortly after having the jab. That’s just a matter of timing. Statistics — it’s inevitable. So, it is true to say in a case like this that correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation.

But then again, there was enough anecdotal evidence of a problem to prompt them to study it in the first place, which means that these results can’t simply be dismissed either. And thankfully, they weren’t dismissed. There’s now been quite a few studies and I can’t go through all of them, but you won’t be surprised to find that the results of this study were not outliers. There are people who suffer serious damage to their eyes, inflammation to their nerves, etc. following mRNA vaccines, and not all of them recover.

In the United States, it is now an accepted fact that complications from the Covid 19 jabs have included relatively minor issues such as conjunctivitis up to retinopathy, eye damage, and Bell’s palsy. Chalk up another one to the conspiracy theorists who have been saying that all along. Now, the mention of Bell’s palsy might have you thinking of Justin Bieber in this very high-profile video. And you may remember that we were told that we were just crazy conspiracy theorists because what Justin Bieber had was not Bell’s palsy. It was Ramsay Hunt disease which is caused by a viral infection, specifically the Varicella Zoster virus.

So we were told that what happened to Bieber couldn’t possibly be caused by the mRNA jabs except that if we go back to that list of the accepted side effects from the jabs, it includes the reactivation of viruses. On this list, it’s the herpes simplex virus. But that’s not the only virus known to reactivate in response to the mRNA jabs. In fact, by mid 2022, we had this case report published of a 65-year-old man who developed Ramsay Hunt syndrome within days of his first mRNA shot. And then, unbelievably, he went ahead with his second shot regardless, after which he suffered a full-blown hemifacial paralysis.

Yeah, no kidding. Six months later, the paralysis and the viral eruption were gone, but his pain and tingling remained even after 6 months. Now, we knew this back in 2022, and ironically, this case report for this 65-year-old man was published in the very same month that Justin Bieber went public with his Ramsay Hunt syndrome. Now, we were mocked for asking whether this might have been associated with the co jabs. And this headline from The Hill was just one of many from the time calling us deniers and conspiracy theorists.

Now, of course, I don’t know with certainty that Bieber’s Ramsay Hunt syndrome was caused by the mRNA jabs, but it seems like a pretty likely candidate given the temporal association, which is just the wanky way of saying the timing, and the fact that we know that Justin Bieber took the co vaccines and was a big supporter of all of the co measures and interventions. Now, Bieber was quite sick for some time, but he did resume touring in 2022, but that was short-lived. On September 4, 2022, Justin Bieber gave what remains to this day his last major performance, which was also cut short due to his own personal health, and he has not toured in the more than two and a half years since then.

Did the mRNA jabs do that? Well, I don’t know for sure that they did, but let’s not forget that it is now accepted that the mRNA jabs can reactivate dormant viruses per the Healthline list of accepted side effects according to US authorities. So, at the very least, we can say that it’s not just a conspiracy theory anymore. But I will admit that it’s not conclusive either. For conclusive proof of nerve or eye or face or any sort of damage, we would need someone to do a very different kind of study.

See, these studies up to this point have been taking people that already have an injury and then trying to figure out why that injury might have occurred.

We need someone to do a very different kind of study. One in which they take a volunteer group of healthy people and they get tested before and then after the mRNA jabs and any differences from the before and the after can then be carefully observed without any sort of self-selection bias in the sense of these being people that are already injured. And that is exactly what was done in this Evaluation of the Effects of mRNA Covid 19 Vaccines on Corneal Endothelia study.

I’ll put the link to this in the video description. But in short, they took 64 patients, measured their eye health, gave them their mRNA jabs, and then measured their eye health again. And the results show that pretty much every single person in the study experienced eye damage to one degree or another. Now, clearly for the vast majority of people, the eye damage caused by mRNA vaccines is within the tolerable limits where most of us can’t tell the difference, at least not with any certainty. But that doesn’t mean that no damage was done. It just means that not enough was done to be visible yet. And it remains to be seen what the long-term impact may be as people who have experienced this minor eye damage then continue to age.

But in short, the endothelial cell density was reduced by being jabbed and the median central corneal thickness was increased by being jabbed. Both of those are bad outcomes and they kind of validate the results from these earlier studies. The differences in your eye health may be pretty marginal, but for people whose eye health is already poor, an mRNA jab might be the final straw, the thing that pushes them over the edge. And to remind you, prior studies found loss of vision exceeding three lines on the eye chart as being within the realms of possibility from an mRNA jab. And that’s just the short-term impact. By definition, we don’t know what the long-term impact is yet.

Now, I’m not trying to fear or scare people or have you losing sleep tonight, but we have to get real because we are still giving these mRNA jabs to people even now today. And more new mRNA jabs are being developed in the expectation that billions of people will soon be taking multiple of these jabs every single year. So call me crazy, but I happen to think it’s important that we be honest about the risks. This being a potential mRNA jab side effect is no longer a wild conspiracy theory. It must be considered a genuine possibility, if not perhaps even a likely explanation. This being a potential mRNA jab side effect is tragically also not a conspiracy theory anymore.

And the USA have updated their mRNA safety warnings to include the risk of heart attacks.

And this — this being caused by the mRNA jabs — is being called a conspiracy theory by the same people that told you that this and this were also conspiracy theories.

Are we ready to have the conversation? ‘Cause it seems like we’re not. I mean, I can’t even say the thing without being in fear of being kicked off this platform. But I hope that with this video, I can shift the needle, if only a little teeny tiny bit, towards us finally being able to actually talk about the risks and for those who have already suffered injuries at the hands of the mRNA jabs to finally be able to tell their stories without being censored for the crime of being a victim of perhaps the greatest medical malpractice in history.

My name’s Topher Field. This is the Topher Project and I’m not here to be just another voice jumping on whatever the latest talking point is, harvesting virality for clicks and ad revenue. I’m here to try in my own small way to make a difference, which is why I’m 100% viewer supported and I appreciate each and every one of you who has bought me a coffee via the button at tofield.net. And to those of you who bought books and DVDs and merchandise from goodpeoplebreakbadlaws.com, thank you for helping me to keep the Topher Project going.

And can you do me a favor? If you know someone who’s been injured by these jabs, can you be extra nice to them, please? Even if you don’t think they deserve it, there’s no need for you to give them an “I told you so” speech. It doesn’t help. And yeah, maybe at the time they were naive. Maybe they were arrogant about it. Maybe they were trapped and believed that they simply had no choice. Whatever the specifics in their case, please don’t lose sight of the fact that they are the victims, not the perpetrators, and the perpetrators have not yet been held to account.

Thank you for watching to the end. Please like, comment, and tell me your story.

Subscribe,

and as always, think free.